Comments on: Forgotten Capitol Hill Mansion Pt. 1

By: Maggie B.

Maggie B. — Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:13:32 +0000

Hello – someone sent me a link to your site; great stuff. any follow up on this post?

Forgotten Capitol Hill Mansion Pt. 1
May 11th, 2009 @ 12:36 am by Cliffe | Sorted Historic Buildings |

By: Android Battery

Android Battery — Fri, 03 Dec 2010 15:43:57 +0000

im seriously tired and tired of the battery on my android going down so fast, seriously annoys the poo outta me, see what happens, find a good site and BAM my battery is dead, so yeah, i luckily had enough battery to read this and post the comment haha, i have no life. yay me!

By: jcricket

jcricket — Thu, 14 May 2009 20:35:28 +0000

This house would be truly great, if there wasn’t such extensive water and mold damage (not to mention the slide potential and where it’s built on the back of the lot).

$1.7 million (which is what they were asking) was too much.

I’m glad someone’s going to fix it up, and I’m glad that someone isn’t me, because I think this is gonna be like that Tom Hanks “Money Pit” movie.

By: Andrew Cencini

Andrew Cencini — Thu, 14 May 2009 17:51:50 +0000

It’s my understanding that the home on 16th (i think it’s 339?) was originally sited on Queen Anne and was moved here at some point. I could have my facts wrong but someone who has lived in my building for a looooong time seemed to know all about the place.

By: Scooter

Scooter — Wed, 13 May 2009 13:18:29 +0000

I live across from that old Victorian on 16th between Thomas & Harrison. Four years ago it might have been salvageable but now it is just too far gone. People think it’s abandoned and it is a magnet for goths, but it is occupied and I wonder how long it will be before it is condemned, torn down, and a cookie cutter townhouse is built in its place. So sad.

By: didi

didi — Tue, 12 May 2009 18:50:15 +0000

Norma Desmond would be proud! It’s like some silent film star’s living quarters decades after the silent film era has passed. What a beautiful home.

By: Matt F

Matt F — Mon, 11 May 2009 21:02:29 +0000

@Colin,
I had the same-era photo (1933) shot of my first house – a little 1912 craftsman cottage in Wallingford – and the accompanying tax sheet at that time said it should last 11 more years, which means that it should have been gone by the end of Wolrd War II. We bought it in 1999, a whopping 55 years after its expiration date. It’s still being loved and lived in by our successors and has better bones than many of the apartment buildings that were put up the year we moved in.

By: Colin

Colin — Mon, 11 May 2009 18:15:11 +0000

strange how the tax assessors said the building would only last 50 more years.

By: matt wright

matt wright — Mon, 11 May 2009 17:06:54 +0000

What a simply incredible house. SOO glad they are restoring what looks like a fantastic property. Love the windows, the trim work, the radiators. everything.

Fingers crossed in a couple of years you will be able to go back and see it after the restoration – or better still, you get some work in progress shots.

By: trickycoolj

trickycoolj — Mon, 11 May 2009 15:59:51 +0000

What a fantastically ornate house! I’d be interested in hearing the back-story as well if you’re able to provide us with some. I always wonder how something such as this becomes abandoned for so long!